On November 14th, 2016 FINTRAC released a brief for all reporting entities who may be involved in real estate transactions. The briefing is intended as guidance to provide some examples of indicators that may be present in transactions that may suggest they are linked to money laundering or terrorist financing. The indicators described have been taken from transactions suspected of being related to money laundering or terrorist financing reported internationally. The briefing focuses on the potential risks and vulnerabilities within the real estate industry and provides suggestions on how to ensure reporting entities are sufficiently meeting suspicious transaction reporting obligations.
The briefing is meant to provide operational guidance given the small overall number of suspicious transactions that have been reported to FINTRAC by the Real Estate industry. The briefing states that these indicators will be used by FINTRAC to assess compliance with your reporting obligations. If you are a reporting entity that interacts with the real estate industry in one form or another, the indicators and scenarios outlined in this brief should be considered when updating your Risk Assessment and training materials.
To put things into perspective, though the actual size of the real estate market is difficult to determine precisely, CMHC has produced some statistics. CMHC suggests that between 2003 and 2013 over $9 trillion of mortgage credits were negotiated and roughly 5 million sales took place through Multiple Listing Services (MLS). In contrast, FINTRAC received only 127 Suspicious Transactions Reports (STRs) from real estate brokers, agents and developers and 152 by other types of reporting entities, such as banks and trust/loan companies. To go a step further, in FINTRAC’s 2015 Annual Report, between April 1, 2014 and March 31, 2015, a total of 92,531 STRs were filed across all reporting entities.
This evidence supports FINTRAC’s assertion that operational guidance for the real estate industry is needed.
The indicators and examples covered in the brief outline numerous scenarios that may suggest that a transaction is related to a money laundering or terrorist financing offense. It also speaks to how the appearance of legitimacy obfuscates the clarity of suspicious transactions and requires more than a just “gut feel”. What is required is the consideration of the facts related to the transaction and their context. Does the transaction with all the known factors, positive or negative, make sense?
What This Means to Your Business?
First off, FINTRAC will be using the indicators provided to assess your compliance with reporting obligations. This has a couple different applications. The first being, does your AML compliance program documentation make reference to the suspicious indicators that are provided. Basically, are staff aware of the elements that may be present in a transaction that would suggest money laundering or terrorist financing may be occurring?
Secondly, is there an oversight process to ensure if there are transactions that contain one or more of these indicators where an STR was not submitted, is reviewed? If so, does the process ensure supporting evidence that the Compliance Officer reviewed the transaction and determined there were not reasonable grounds to suspect its relation to money laundering or terrorist financing? When you encounter a transaction involving any of the indicators provided, it is very important that you collect as much information as possible to assist the Compliance Officer with their determination of whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a transaction, or attempted transaction, may be related to money laundering or terrorist financing. Alternatively, even if none of the indicators provided by FINTRAC are present but we still feel there is “something off” about our customer’s transaction, speak with your Compliance Officer. They will be able to provide some insight on additional information that may assist our decision. Once you have collected any additional information you may still not feel comfortable, but this does not mean you cannot complete the transaction, but that you must be sure your Compliance Officer is provided with all the information, which includes our reason for the escalation, so that they can decide whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect it may be related to a money laundering or terrorist financing offense. The Compliance Officer will document their decision and, if necessary, submit an STR to FINTRAC.
Need a Hand?
If you are a reporting entity that interacts with the real estate industry and would like assistance updating your AML compliance program documentation or simply have some questions, please contact us.